This "minimally invasive education" that Dr. Sumatra Mitra speaks of is remarkable. Basically, the idea of allowing children to teach themselves based on pure curiosity fueling their motivation to learn. It is astonishing to witness children, with barely a basic education, learning how to use a computer in somewhat complex ways all on their own. I appreciated the social aspect that the computer brought to this experiment, as well. Students were able to interact with one another, teach each other and collaborate with one another to figure out new aspects.
I agree that children must be computer-literate in today’s world, but it is hard to imagine how these kids will now use these basic computer skills to further their future in the slums. Was Dr. Mitra’s intention to simply show how individuals can teach themselves how to use a computer without any explanation? Or was there a larger goal to be reached for these children in context? Either way, I think the essential idea is that technology is rampant in society and we should rely on it. These children in India that do not have an impressive education, and probably will not anytime soon, can increase their knowledge on their own a considerable amount just by having a single computer. I keep thinking that if this is the case, then the necessity for teachers seems to drop a bit. So much can be learned with the use of technology. It is something to keep thinking about for sure.
I've had the same questions as you about how a computer in the slums could further the education of the children who live there. Part of me wants to say that we need to take care of the poverty first, but a part of me says that learning how to use the computer might empower them to be able to make positive changes in their lives.
ReplyDelete